{"id":10947,"date":"2025-05-10T12:00:08","date_gmt":"2025-05-10T12:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ksk-dev.eu\/?p=10947"},"modified":"2025-05-12T12:11:42","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T10:11:42","slug":"what-you-need-to-know-to-obtain-a-b-card-as-a-migrant-worker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ksk-dev.eu\/en\/what-you-need-to-know-to-obtain-a-b-card-as-a-migrant-worker\/","title":{"rendered":"CCE cancels revocation of combined license due to lack of evidence of fraud"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

In ruling no. 302.421 of February 28, 2024, the Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers (CCE) overturned a decision by the Office des Etrangers (BIZ). The decision concerned the revocation of a combined permit on the basis of alleged fraud, but the elements invoked were deemed insufficiently substantiated.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

Strict burden of proof in cases of fraud<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CCE pointed out that the IBZ is bound by a strict burden of proof when revoking a right of residence under article 74\/20, \u00a72 of the Residence Act. Withdrawal is a discretionary power and mere doubt is not sufficient. The CCE analyzed the concrete elements on which the IBZ based its decision:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n